VOLUME 109 ISSUE 7
ONLINE EXCLUSIVES AT PCCCOURIER.COM
March 6, 2014
~o
Й
з
ra m
C
MENUS
Discover the secret
menus that surround the
campus.
PACE
7»
the Quad with
explosive vocals.
PAGE
6»
SPEAK OUT!
Do you think
E-Cigarettes should
be banned in Los
Angeles?
Vote at
PccCourier. com
HOOP DREAMS DASHED
Billy Skelly/Courier
Averie-Alice Guzman (25) watches the clock as it with seconds left in the playoff game against Long Beach City College on
Wednesday. The men's basketball team also lost its playoff game against Chaffey College last night to end its season.
CAPM dispute resolved
Kristina Wedseltoft and
Philip McCormick
Staff Writers
For the first time this academ¬
ic year, the Council on Aca¬
demic and Professional Matters
(CAPM) met after an ongoing
dispute between President Mark
Rocha and the Academic Senate
about whether the meeting was
subject to the Brown Act and
thus open to the public.
“We only went back because
the administration turned it into
a Brown Act meeting,” Academ¬
ic Senate Treasurer Daniel Haley
said. “There were some issues
put on the table and we are off
to a good start.”
Mary Thompson, adminis¬
trative assistant to the board,
explained that because CAPM
was created by board policy it
is covered by the Brown Act
and is subject to public notice
and open for all to attend. In an
email to the senate, Rocha also
said that he agrees the meeting
must be open to the public.
CAPM is a forum for discus¬
sion and mutual agreement. It
is the primary communication
mechanism between the faculty,
administration, and the Board of
Trustees.
“I’m happy about the turn¬
out,” Haley said. “A lot of
faculty showed up to support
the senate.”
Haley said the next CAPM
meeting would be on March 31.
Once the meeting started, the
senate and Rocha debated the
origins of $400,000 in funding
now available to faculty under
the Student Access to Success
Initiative (SASI).
Rocha said during the meet¬
ing that the discussion of SASI
funds goes back “into ancient
history.” In Dec. 2010, on Pres¬
ident Rocha’s recommendation
to the administration, the Board
of Trustees set aside $1 million
Board
rebuffs
town hall
invite
Christine Michaels
Editor-in-Chief
The Board of Trustees
declined to attend an Academic
Senate-run Town Hall in a letter
sent out to the entire campus,
arguing that the meeting is
redundant.
The Academic Senate Ad
Hoc Committee for Town Halls,
headed by senators Melissa Mi-
chelson, Yolanda McKay, David
Cuatt, Kristin Pilon and Martha
House, invited the board earlier
this year to attend its Town Hall
in April.
Michelson sent out an invi¬
tation to both the board and
Rocha on Feb. 26 with the inten¬
tion of having an open dialogue
among college constituents.
TOWN HALL page 6
CAPM page 7 ►
Video still courtesy of Faculty Association
President Mark Rocha and Academic Senate President Eduar¬
do Cairo talk about issues at the CAPM meeting on Monday.
School approves independent climate survey
Christine Michaels
Editor-in-Chief
The college will distribute a
staff-wide campus climate survey
on March 19 designed to mea¬
sure the quality of the school’s
workplace, according to college
officials.
An independent company,
Modern Think, which has
worked with over 300 colleges
in a standardized questionnaire
called “Great Colleges To Work
For”, wih conduct the survey.
Crystal Kollross, interim director
of institutional effectiveness, is
working closely with Modern
Think and emphasized the stan¬
dardization of the survey.
“Every 300 colleges that gets
the survey gets the same one,”
she said. “And that’s beneficial.
It gives us a benchmark to look
at how do we score compared to
other colleges. I like something
to benchmark ourselves against.”
According to the Modern
Think survey website, chroni-
clegreatcolleges.com, more than
45,000 employees in colleges
across the country have already
taken the standardized survey.
Modern Think also conduct¬
ed the 201 1 campus climate
survey on campus, according to
Kollross.
However, according to some
faculty members, such as ESL
instructor and member of the
Academic Senate survey com¬
mittee Melissa Michelson, the
survey should have staff involve¬
ment.
“How come we were not
asked to work on questions for
the survey?” she asked. “[Faculty
was given] no input to decide
which questions to gather [for
the upcoming survey].”
Kollross explained that the
administration had no involve¬
ment other than changing the
name of the survey and adjust¬
ing employee demographics.
“I find that to be very, very
interesting. It’s not like I was
involved,” Kollross said. “It’s a
standard survey that’s adminis¬
tered so it’s not like I in any way
was able to modify the ques¬
tions.”
Kollross described many ques¬
tions on the survey as “hard hit¬
ting,” and ranging on topics such
as leadership efficiency, overall
satisfaction in the workplace
environment, and satisfaction of
employee benefits.
The administration plans to
have Modern Think present the
results of the survey after it is
completed to give feedback and
analytics regarding the data. The
survey deadline is scheduled for
April 4.